Tuesday, April 28, 2015

TMZ Hypermutation in LGG (Low Grade Glioma)

I’ve been meaning to write about this issue for several months, and apologize for the delay in sharing. I was overwhelmed by the magnitude of the report, and didn’t know how to broach it. This is by far one of the most important research studies I've ever read regarding low grade glioma. Finally, some legitimate information which should help patients decide on treatments. I have sent the papers to my tumor friends that I know are considering, or on TMZ, of the hypermutation issue, and now I know that a post has to be written for those out there on the interwebs looking for direction on whether or not to take temozolomide (TMZ) for a low grade glioma. I’m going to embed the research study, along with the supplement, and although I realize not many are interested in reading the entire report (which is actually only three pages of reading), I’m providing a few teasers so that you can either get the gist of it, or it may even entice you into reading the whole thing. Just as an aside, if I know you already took TMZ for your low grade glioma, I did not send the documents to you. I went back and forth on whether I should say something, or not, and I decided it would only be harmful, and scary. If you've already taken it, there's nothing you can do. And ultimately, most likely, if you are a hypermutator, you would have found out with a recurrence during or around treatment. 


Mutational Analysis Reveals the Origin and Therapy-Driven Evolution of Recurrent Glioma 
(TMZ Hypermutation of grade 2 glioma induced into GBM)

“Beyond maximal, safe, surgical resection, there is currently no standard of care for patients with low-grade glioma, and options include surveillance, adjuvant radiation alone, TMZ alone, or radiation and TMZ.”

"While the initial tumors and most of the recurrent tumors in our cohort had 0.2-4.5 mutations per megabase (Mb) (21, 22), six of the ten patients treated with TMZ had recurrent tumors that were hypermutated; that is, they harbored 31.9-90.9 mutations per Mb (table S6).”

"The introduction of thousands of de novo mutations may drive the evolution of TMZ-resistant glioma cells to higher states of malignant potential (1, 23). Indeed, all six recurrent tumors that showed evidence of TMZ-induced hypermutation underwent malignant progression to GBM, a high-grade tumor with a worse prognosis (8, 9).”

"We also demonstrated an alternative evolutionary path of low-grade glioma that is largely determined by adjuvant chemotherapy with TMZ.”

“Mutation rates in each tumor pair suggested that >98.7% are due to TMZ-induced mutagenesis (10).”

"There is currently no information on whether treatment of grade II astrocytomas with TMZ confers longer overall survival (8)."

"Future basic and clinical studies must weigh the initial antitumor effects of TMZ against the potential risk of inducing new driver mutations and malignant progression.


What I see, that is lacking in our medical system, is a complete disconnect between current research and general practice. I’d like to think that doctors want us to survive, that they prescribe treatments to prolong our lives, but the fact remains that the current system is antiquated, and dangerous. It’s dangerous because there is tons of research being done, but doctors are not aware of the changes, and new developments. When a study like this comes out, every nerco-oncologist in the world should be aware, and changes in treatment recommendations should be adjusted accordingly. People are dying because of this lack of knowledge. It’s unacceptable. 

We are not receiving “best practice” we are receiving “marginal, outdated practice”. I recognize that doctors are busy, that they have massive workloads, and we can’t expect them to be up on all the latest research (or can we) but this is our lives, we need the most cutting edge information. It is my opinion that before neuro-oncologists prescribe TMZ alone (or even in combination with radiation) low grade patients should be apprised of the serious risks of taking TMZ. That using it alone (on low grade glioma specifically) has shown a 60% chance of causing a recurrence that will present as a GBM. That is a horrendous risk. It’s well known that brain tumors recur and recur and recur until it progresses to the point where it kills you, but usually with low grades (left untreated by TMZ or radiation) it most often recurs as the same low grade. At least for the first few tumor recurrences. Living a life with a glioma is a chess game. It’s always a guessing game about when to treat and what treatment to use. You don’t want to “poke the beast” with the wrong treatments, yet you often aren’t comfortable with the standard wait and watch protocol. 

It is imperative that patients know the dangers of TMZ with low grade glioma so that they can make educated decisions. That’s why I’m writing this blog post. I hope it helps spread the word that treatment with TMZ for low grade glioma has inherent danger.

Want to know what my buddy Stephen from Astrocytoma Options says? 


One of the many things I appreciate about Astrocytoma Options is that Stephen has a way of digesting information and using it to our advantage. What I'm saying in this blog post, is not that we should throw out TMZ, but that we need to better understand it's benefits and downfalls. It may still be a benefit in a cocktail approach, but needs to chosen with care. 


I hope this information lives on in the interwebs, the information must get out, and it seems as if we have to change the way we are treated, literally, by informing our oncologists.

6 comments:

  1. Wow, I have read this 2x and I still feel like I have to pull my jaw back up! Not once has my oncologist nor anyone ever mentioned this study. I feel blessed to have found your blog, what a wealth of information. Thank you so very much for all that you do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. has any new information come out about this issue in the last year?
    Our oncologist was aware of the study, but thought it had deficiencies as a good comprehensive study and along with other factors was OK prescribing TMZ for our patient's Astrocytoma Grade II brain tumor both concurrent with radiation and after radiation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown, I'm looking into this further, and reached out to one of my brilliant brain tumor researcher buddies to discuss. I will comment again soon with what I find out.

      Delete
  3. New information on this was published as an abstract for the 2015 annual SNO conference:

    http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/suppl_5/v97.1.full

    I was able to find out that in the expanded cohort, 11 out of 21 grade II, IDH1 mutant astrocytomas were hypermutated at recurrence. 7 out of 12 grade II, IDH1 mutant, 1p/19q codeleted oligodendrogliomas were hypermutated at recurrence. All but one of these patients were treated with TMZ alone (without radiation). It seems the risk of hypermutation is around 50% for both grade 2, IDH1 mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma treated with TMZ alone. The researchers are still trying to figure out why some but not all tumors respond this way to this treatment. This updated information has not yet been published in a journal.

    A further unanswered question would be: does the same risk apply to tumors treated with concurrent radiation and TMZ, as opposed to TMZ alone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stephen, you, my friend, are the best! Thank you :)

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Back to Top