From The Darkest Place Comes Empowerment

Still trying to wrap my mind around glutamine vs glutamate. Boy, I didn't realize how easy I had it back in the days of the macronutrients of the restricted ketogenic diet. Thankfully, Stephen sent me a quick summation a few moments ago saving me from my dark rabbit hole of searching, "Glutamine is an amino acid that circulates in the blood at high levels, and glutamate is derived from glutamine by one enzymatic step. See the attached diagram. The cell can take in either glutamine or glutamate. Glutamine can be converted to glutamate, glutamate is converted to alpha-ketoglutarate, and the IDH1/IDH2 mutant enzyme converts alpha-ketoglutarate into 2-HG, which accumulates to high levels and causes tumorigenesis. IDH-non mutated lower grade tumours might have different metabolic needs."

Do I understand it now? Kind of. I think I'll need to keep reading it and rereading it in order to cement things. So glutamate is not in foods, but glutamine is. In the body glutamine can convert into glutamate which converts into that alpha thingy and my IDH1 mutated tumor will change that alpha thingy into 2-HG which causes the tumor to generate more tumor cells. Bad. Okay. Next step, I need to memorize that alpha hyphenated word (shouldn't be too hard since it starts with keto and glutarate is pretty similar to glutamate just switch the m to an r...I think I'm onto something) and intimately understand what 2-HG is/does so that I can recognize them in research. (What about 2-HighGlutarate? Okay, just Googled, and instead of high, I'll use the legit term of hydroxy and slam glutarate (which was a good guess) on the end, which makes sense. Bam. Not too bad.) Is your brain spinning, too? That was very successful. I feel a little accomplished, as if I just traversed my own mental wormhole.

Now this is where pathology becomes paramount. If you're wanting to dabble in preventing your tumor from growing, you need to know what you're working with. Every single tumor's pathology is unique, which makes it difficult. However most all tumors are on the spectrum for various categories regarding mutations (yes/no), proliferation rates (%), GFAP (also a % I believe), etc. In rare cases, they may not even be that similar to other brain tumors, instead they may be more similar to a breast tumor or pancreatic tumor (just throwing those out there). You never know. We need to look outside the box for our treatments learning from like-pathology correlations. We really don't have much to lose since standard of care is essentially failing most of us. I remember when I looked into my pathology for the first time, it was terrifying. It was depressing. It was the darkest place I had ever looked. But I pushed on because I wanted answers. I don't want to waste my time, my energy, my resources, on things that will not aid in my survival. Reading the pathology from the second brain tumor was equally scary, but I'd grown tougher skin. As they do, things had changed. The proliferation rate was higher, among other things, which of course is sobering, but it doesn't mean that you give up - panic a little but never give up. I'm learning more than ever, and constantly feel like I can almost touch a cure, or at least stability. Guess we'll know more on that front in a few weeks. I can't believe the MRI is in ten days.

Here's a link to the AO page that discusses the glutamine quandary, I forgot to include it in the last post. Don't forget, it seems specific to IDH mutations, not wild-type.